Monday, April 04, 2005

Consider the experiment of the atomic clock in orbit, where it slowed down over time, while it is traveling in orbit at high speed.

This has been generally regarded as 1 proof of general relativity, where it was suggested that the time frame of an object traveling at some fraction of the speed of light will slow down compared to objects not in motion.

But that is also counter to logic, since all motions are relative, then it is just as relatively in framework that the satellite is not in motion, but rather the earth is in orbit around the satellite. Then how can the satellite clock slow down compared to Earth?

Perhaps, time is related to some factor of Gravity, or perhaps this experiment was wrong?

In relation to the Theory of Everything, it is said that general relativity only accounts for Gravity and EM.

Now, if we only think about these 2 forces in quantum scale, it can be conjectured that all atomic and subatomic structures would collapse into singularities, if only these 2 forces are available.

So, some other forces must be available to counteract these 2 forces.

But perhaps, the other forces are the same as Gravity and EM, but only on the smaller scales.

Perhaps, they are merely the result of Chaos factors, interacting with Gravity and EM?